MarIus
Arkiv
Tema
Om oss
Kontakt
Søk
menu
Søk
Om oss
MarIus
Siste utgave
Les siste utgave på nett
Tidligere utgaver
Arkiv
Utgave 578/2024
Port safety warranties in Charterparties in the context of the Ukrainian-Russian War
When the time charterer redelivers on short notice
The law of the sea challenges pertaining to the regulation of navigational rights and freedoms on the Northern Sea Route: Russia’s excessive maritime claims
Selected Master Theses
Port safety warranties in Charterparties in the context of the Ukrainian-Russian War
When the time charterer redelivers on short notice
The law of the sea challenges pertaining to the regulation of navigational rights and freedoms on the Northern Sea Route: Russia’s excessive maritime claims
Preface
1 Introduction
2 Coastal State jurisdiction as defined by UNCLOS: emphasis on navigational rights and freedoms
3 UNCLOS Article 234 as Arctic lex-specialis : still susceptible to interpretational complexities?
4 Does Russia have enhanced jurisdictional authority under Article 234 to regulate navigation on the NSR? Examination of Russian legislation
5 The South China Sea Arbitration: Stimulating a renewed concern over the legitimacy of Russia's historic internal waters claim?
5.1 Introductory remarks
5.2 Development of the historic waters doctrine
5.3 Russia's NSR historic waters claim's test against overarching criteria from the South China Sea Arbitration
5.4 Interplay between Russia’s historic waters claim and UNCLOS
6 Conclusion
Bibliography
Publiseringspolitikk
5 The South China Sea Arbitration: Stimulating a renewed concern over the legitimacy of Russia's historic internal waters claim?
578/2024
5 The South China Sea Arbitration: Stimulating a renewed concern over the legitimacy of Russia's historic internal waters claim?
Forrige
4.2 Does Article 234 allow NSR’s prior authorisation regime?
Neste
5.1 Introductory remarks