MarIus
Arkiv
Tema
Om oss
Kontakt
Søk
menu
Søk
Om oss
MarIus
Siste utgave
Les siste utgave på nett
Tidligere utgaver
Arkiv
Utgave 551/2021
Direct action against liability insurer - jurisdiction and choice of law issues
The relationship between nautical fault and initial unseaworthiness under the Hague-Visby Rules
The new Norwegian space law: work in progress
EU Energy Law and Fundamental Rights
SIMPLY 2020
Direct action against liability insurer - jurisdiction and choice of law issues
The relationship between nautical fault and initial unseaworthiness under the Hague-Visby Rules
1 Introduction
2 The Sunna and the questions raised therein
3 Some structural points relating to the Hague-Visby Rules and their transformation into the Maritime Code
3.3 Approach to construction illustrated by the Australian High Court case, the Bunga Seroja
4 The nature of nautical fault and its relationship to initial seaworthiness
4.1 The problem
4.2 The nature and scope of nautical fault
4.3 The interrelation between nautical fault (navigational fault) and initial unseaworthiness
4.4 The interrelation between nautical fault (mismanagement of the ship) and initial seaworthiness
4.5 Is the topic resolved through the English Court of Appeal case, the Libra?
4.6 Shipowners' vicarious liability for master's fault -"latent human defect" and unseaworthiness
4.7 Summarising remarks - with a look to the Norwegian Supreme Court case, the Vågland
5 The concept of seaworthiness and Norwegian courts' use of foreign law definitions - the Sunny Lady
The new Norwegian space law: work in progress
EU Energy Law and Fundamental Rights
Publiseringspolitikk
4 The nature of nautical fault and its relationship to initial seaworthiness
551/2021
4 The nature of nautical fault and its relationship to initial seaworthiness
Forrige
3.4 Illustration of inadequate approach of construction taken by the Norwegian Supreme Court in the Sunna
Neste
4.1 The problem