MarIus
Arkiv
Tema
Om oss
Kontakt
Søk
menu
Søk
Om oss
MarIus
Siste utgave
Les siste utgave på nett
Tidligere utgaver
Arkiv
Utgave 551/2021
Direct action against liability insurer - jurisdiction and choice of law issues
The relationship between nautical fault and initial unseaworthiness under the Hague-Visby Rules
The new Norwegian space law: work in progress
EU Energy Law and Fundamental Rights
SIMPLY 2020
Direct action against liability insurer - jurisdiction and choice of law issues
1. The background for the two decisions
2. The parties and the procedural story
3. The direct action against Gard - phase one (Stolt I)
3.1. The domestic law: the Insurance Contracts Act
3.2. Court jurisdiction and the Lugano Convention
3.3. Stolt I - the majority's view
3.4. Stolt I – the view of the minority
4. The direct action against Gard - phase two (Stolt II)
5. Thorco's claim against Stolt -phase one (Stolt I)
6. Thorco's claim against Stolt -phase two (Stolt II)
7. Stolt I and Stolt II - a summary and "the thereafter"
8. Stolt I and Stolt II - some reflections
The relationship between nautical fault and initial unseaworthiness under the Hague-Visby Rules
The new Norwegian space law: work in progress
EU Energy Law and Fundamental Rights
Publiseringspolitikk
3. The direct action against Gard - phase one (Stolt I)
551/2021
3. The direct action against Gard - phase one (Stolt I)
Forrige
2. The parties and the procedural story
Neste
3.1. The domestic law: the Insurance Contracts Act